Talk:Frank Jump
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Notcharizard in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
More sources
[edit]https://www.frankjump.com/press.html has more sources that I haven't gone through yet. If anyone wants to help sift through them, that'd be great. Nerd1a4i (they/them) (talk) 02:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability regarding wp:gng coverage of the person. However the book is wp:notable and am marking it as reviewed based on it being coverage of the book. Happy editing!
North8000 (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that it’s a borderline case - but the references really only seem to show that one of the author’s books is notable, and that does not make the author notable. -- NotCharizard 🗨 22:58, 3 April 2025 (UTC)