Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Frank Chaloupka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by BD2412 in topic caveat- industry funded BLP
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Chaloupka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

caveat- industry funded BLP

[edit]

looks like a page paid for /commissioned by the tobacco industry / control fund. full of lousy refs.just to appear on Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco page. Wuerzele (talk) 21:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Wuerzele: That is a rather odd take considering that I created this article over 22 years ago, and Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco wasn't even started for more than a decade after that. I have not seen and am not aware of anything emanating either from the individual or the organization that would be "commissioned by the tobacco industry". BD2412 T 02:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply