Talk:For Your Validation
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from For Your Validation appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Some Additional Assistance
[edit]Hi, @Launchballer! I have seen your work on the Alessi Rose article, and it is fantastic, so I was just wondering if you could help me write and research more information on Rose's second EP for a Wikipedia page. We could work on her debut EP first, but the thing is this one has a lot more secondary sources available than the first one, so yeah. Let me know if you're up for it! Santi20374 (talk) 19:11, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'd need to refamiliarise myself with the sources, but I suspect Rumination As Ritual would struggle to meet WP:GNG. I can certainly look at this one though.--Launchballer 21:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks! Santi20374 (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Lyricism and music
[edit]@Launchballer: Since you wrote some stuff about the songs, and what they're about, maybe we can elaborate, or even move what you wrote about them into "Lyricism and music"? Santi20374 (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- I certainly don't recommend splitting it into its own section as MOS:OVERSECTION discourages having too many section headers. Also, I removed Undrtheradar as I couldn't see how it verified the first claim and 'artist performs track' isn't really encyclopedic.--Launchballer 13:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you. Santi20374 (talk) 17:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Ready to go?
[edit]@Launchballer: Do you think we're ready to submit for review? It looks pretty much done. :) Santi20374 (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't submit articles for review, I publish them when they're ready, which this almost is. (Not all of the tour table's sourced.)--Launchballer 17:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- I also expanded the lead and added one more review before publication.--Launchballer 18:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- I removed the tour dates table because I feel like that shouldn't be part of it just yet, maybe a separate article for the tour if it meets WP:GNG Santi20374 (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- In retrospect, I think you're right about the table, though I'm not convinced the tour would pass GNG though.--Launchballer 18:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- So for now, I think we should just leave it as is and maybe later we can add it. Santi20374 (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- In retrospect, I think you're right about the table, though I'm not convinced the tour would pass GNG though.--Launchballer 18:52, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 18:25, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- ... that the Alessi Rose EP For Your Validation contains lyrics "guaranteed to make your Aunt Bridie blush", according to one reviewer?
- ALT1: ... that a tour promoting the Alessi Rose EP For Your Validation sold out in ten minutes?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Fatma Hassona
- Comment: Audrey Hobert, who cowrote one track, was created earlier today by @Meena:; may top her up to 1500 and run this as a joint nom.
Launchballer 18:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC).
Source for hook was not listed in nomination, but it checks out. QPQ is done, hook is funny, page is new enough and long enough. Earwig says violation unlikely. Looks good to me. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- I love this so much! Santi20374 (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
"Reception" section?
[edit]@Launchballer: Since you wrote a lot of critic reviews all over the page, do you think we could sort most, if not all of them to a specific section for them called "Reception"? Santi20374 (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- I recommend against this. Two reasons; much of the reception refers to singles, and MOS:OVERSECTION recommends using fewer section headings where possible.--Launchballer 16:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Alright. Santi20374 (talk) 17:04, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
