Talk:Foobar
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scram switch, etc.
[edit]Was FOO displayed or F00. Because if you're working with something with 12 bits, loading a psw or register with F00 might be meaningful (or just funny if you know what "foo" is). Sort of a corollary to the mythic trouble report "Equipment doesn't work when selector knob is in the zero fox fox position". If so, the Foo in data processing may be a chicken and egg with F00.
Wikipedia
[edit]Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Foo (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:06, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- The move discussion is closed are we now accepting new comments here?
- "The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion." Sdctrg (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Broken citation
[edit]It is possible that foobar is a playful allusion to the World War II-era military slang FUBAR (fucked up beyond all recognition).
The citation for this returns a 404. I question whether this is indeed true, without proper citation I suggest this is speculative and should be removed.