Talk:Floating charge

The content of Qualifying floating charge was merged into Floating charge on 3 March 2026. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re-write

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Did a bit of a re-write on this article. Apologies if I have trampled on anyone's toes, but this article looked like it needed love, and hadn't had any in a long time. Legis 13:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aus & NZ

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was reading Getzler & Payne, Company Charges - Spectrum and Beyond (ISBN 0-19-929993-5) and in the foreword Lord Millett claims that the floating charge has been abolished in Australia and New Zealand. Is that correct? --Legis (talk - contributions) 16:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I propose merging Qualifying floating charge into Floating charge. I think the content in 'Qualifying floating charge' can easily be explained in the context of this article, and merging them would not cause any article-size or weighting problems. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Re-write

Aus & NZ

Merge proposal