Talk:Financial Intelligence Unit

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

Removal of Executives list and other clean up

Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This information seems unnecessary and I believe would fall under the Wikipedia:Coatrack articles policy. Only one appears to have an article, which would mean the notability mentioned in the introductory statement hasn't been met - right?

There is also repeated information in the "Overview" and "Examples" sections. As a newer editor, I would like to help with the clean up, but could someone please confirm I would not be out of line by making some big changes? USnoozieULoozie (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I am of the same view. As an encyclopedia entry, it should not contain all the text about the FIU threshold for the US and the EU FIU Network and its executives. The Examples section needs to go. The Egmont article has the list of members, so anyone who wants to explore can just go there.

I added a couple of sources and minor additions; skipped copy edits because I think that a large chunk of the article is good for deletion. Same dilemma as you; I don't want to be that guy. However, as we agree, I guess we can go ahead with the cleanup Ar1201u1 (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I decided to "be bold". I think this covers most of what you mentioned. I removed the heads of FIUs based on the fact that, all but one would not be considered notable, and it looked like it was simply inserted into an existing section. I did a handful of other fixes with punctuation and list format consistency. It looks and reads better now to me. It is not perfect, but it has improved. USnoozieULoozie (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Removal of Executives list and other clean up