Talk:FarPoint Spread

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Kimnathans (talk · contribs) has been paid by GrapeCity. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosure of paid editing made at Talk:GrapeCity.

Please hold off as we intend to edit this page. I just came back to post a disclaimer when I saw the speedy deletion marking. Will edit with NPOV today.

I am looking at the content of this page to see what edits are needed to align it with what I see in other software articles (namely Crystal Reports and Microsoft Excel) and I am uncertain about what flagged this article for deletion while allowing those other articles. I am new to this, so maybe I am missing a subtle difference. Can someone please let me know what I am missing? Thanks! Kimnathans (talk) 19:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I guess it wasn't that subtle--I removed the awards and recognitions section. Thanks! Kimnathans (talk) 19:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I went through each section and edited everything to use a more neutral point of view. Please let me know whether this article is now within the standards of the ones I used as my guides. Thanks! Kimnathans (talk) 20:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the newbie jabbering. I had not followed the link to the Articles for Deletion page, and had not yet seen that it was marked for deletion because of notability. I have since added a number of third party references. Kimnathans (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.