Talk:Family preservation

Neutrality disputed

The "criticism" section of this article relies too much on biased sources (WP:BIASED) from advocacy organizations such as the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform and others for statements of fact, rather than attributed opinions (see Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources that are usually not reliable). It gives equal weight to assertions by such organizations compared with more reliable third-party sources, in violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight.

— Coconutporkpie (talk) 19:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)