Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them.
"...between 2010 and 2011, Wikipedia users edited and added some of the new studies—as well as Professor Lisak's critique of Eugene J. Kanin—to the site's "False Accusation of Rape" entry. As recorded by the entry's "Talk" page, the article's author, a rape denier, then removed some of the new material. These actions caused the new research, non-Kanin material to be unavailable to Wikipedia readers. The hullabaloo stands as a mini-version of the whole controversy."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
Latest comment: 10 months ago8 comments4 people in discussion
I want to add a paragraph or a section including the concerning amount of false rape accusations of white women against white men in modern day West, with recurring motives that include misandry, media attention, psychological issues and jealousy, but seems the way I wanted to write it wasn't acceptable, can someone write it in my place the proper way, since I don't want to risk to invalidate my purpose with a potential edit war, please? 151.36.46.173 (talk) 08:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
wikipedia edits are supposed to be neutral, verifiable, and not original research. Your sources may have been fine, but your usage of them seemed to be completely random. Tdmurlock (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I mean 3+ years of disruption with sockpuppets and many IPs after getting blocked as User:Honest Yusuf Cricket. I mean a bunch of IPs from the Greater Milan area, and some proxy IPs from elsewhere. I mean disruption so broad that you got globally locked. Binksternet (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Does this also mean that the category "stereotypes about white women" should be removed from the article? Perhaps I was inattentive, but I didn't find any indication in the article that false rape accusations are stereotypes about white women. In fact, the article even focuses more on cases in Korea. Solaire the knight (talk) 04:00, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Laura Hood of Stockport UK was sentenced to 3 years in prison for false accusations of rape which ruined two male victim's lives, including a father to two children. This case should be added to the list of convictions and prison sentences for women who falsely accuse someone of rape.
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The section about South Korea seems to be excessively long and detailed, and possibly POV. The fact that it relies exclusively on Korean-langauage sources also makes it difficult to double-check. I would suggest eliminating it, or at least paring it down significantly. Tad Lincoln (talk) 23:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
i agree; it seems incredibly overly opinionated. i was kind of shocked by its quality relative to the remainder of the article. definitely not up to standard. i’m not even a regular editor, i just think a page for a topic this volatile needs far more care to account for highly subjective and editorialized summarization like the sk section. ~2025-36255-06 (talk) 00:30, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Stacey Sharples (UK) sentenced to 4 years in prison for falsely accusing 10 men of rape
Added the links following Wikipedia Reliable Sources showing the seriousness of the UK crime of perverting the course of justice (false accusations) and that serious crime resulting in 4 years in prison for the woman. Wikipedia reliable sources - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. This follows that a UK national law is widespread enough to not be a "tiny minority" as mentioned in the Wikipedia Reliable Sources page ("Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects.").