Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a long-standing consensus on WP to reserve the word journal for things like diaries and, especially, academic journals, which are peer-reviewed scholarly works. This does not mean that "magazine" is pejorative of somehow means something of lesser value. It just serves clarity in what we are talking about. This publication is not peer-reviewed and, although it obviously publishes high-quality articles with much science in its contents, it does not cover original scientific research. Hence, it's a magazine (or, if one prefers, a professional or trade magazine; the last edit summary by Philafrenzy -"for dealers and collectors"- would suggest that the latter is most appropriate). --Randykitty (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
