Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Fairfields

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by John Maynard Friedman in topic Broken links
[edit]

The change in subject of this article from a redirect to Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company has left behind a number of links that now reach an inappropriate article. These need to be fixed. It takes some work to track them down because this title has been added to a template that is splashed across every parish in the Milton Keynes area. Although the article should probably be approved, it can't really be with the current problems. Lithopsian (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I accept that I ought to have checked rather than just assume that the redirect was intended to catch fat thumbs. "Fairfields" for "Fairfield" is not an obvious mistake to be in many articles. I guess there was a clue in the fact that it didn't redirect the Fairfield, a disambiguation article. In the short term, anyone misdirected will see the hat note first and go to the Fairfield article, where Fairfield Shipbuilding is listed. I will work through the "what links here" list to redirect any shipbuilding articles correctly. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
I've created a redirect at Fairfields (engineering company) to help people looking for that company under its colloquial name. Still uncertain about other changes such as a new dab page, but the redirect may be more helpful in the hatnote than a link to a page about a load of things not called Fairfields. Or both. Lithopsian (talk) 17:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have been through all the "what links here" and dabbed any that were going to "Fairfields" rather than Fairfield Shipbuilding. There weren't many. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply