Talk:F-Secure

Number of offices

The article contradicts itself in the first two sentences about the number of offices:

F-Secure Corporation [...] with over 30 offices [...]

The company has nearly 30 offices [...]

Which number is true at the moment (May/June 2022), more than 30 offices or less? Both numbers have been set/edited in December 2020. --Hermodurin (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Redirect

Since the name F-Secure Corporation is bolded, and I assume an official name (this is how I attempted to originally get to this page), how about a redirect from F-Secure Corporation to here? 73.173.14.14 (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Company Logo

Could someone add the F-Secure company logo to this page? It is available in a press kit here: http://www.f-secure.com/en_EMEA-Corp/pressroom/gallery/logos/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayhaymate (talk • contribs) 13:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:F-Secure logo.svg

Image:F-Secure logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Controversy section has very poor sourcing

The only source is a broken link. Please fix this or remove the section completely. BoatyKappa (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Controversy section should be deleted

There is nothing controversial in the Controversies section at all. The text in the section contains commendable practises. Let me suggest DELETION OF THE "Controversies" SECTION. --Szozdakosvi (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, zapped. Wire723 (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)