Talk:Express Entry

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 May 2018 by reviewer Dial911 (talk · contribs).

Canada: Governments Low‑importance

	Canada portal Canada notice board This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Removing templates

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is it okay to remove the template now? The article seems to have many references from various credible sources. FungTraC (talk) 11:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think so.

Done PK T(alk) 16:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to Update Express Entry Draw Statistics and Reference Links

Latest comment: 22 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Express Entry. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest.
The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 893 requests waiting for review.

Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input.

Hello fellow editors,

I would like to propose a minor update to the Express Entry article to ensure that the reference links and overview notes regarding application tracking milestones and processing timelines align with current federal guidelines.

Specifically, sections referencing post-submission documentation stages, Acknowledgement of Receipt (AOR) timelines, and status milestones can benefit from updated verification notes pointing directly to current IRCC operational frameworks.

Proposed adjustments to consider: 1. Refining terminology around post-ITA document submissions and AOR milestones. 2. Updating citation references to reflect current administrative processing standards.

Please let me know your thoughts or if we should review the section structure further before implementing changes.

Sakshamsalvi (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Removing templates

Proposal to Update Express Entry Draw Statistics and Reference Links