Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Exponential utility

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Bequw in topic Formula

Formula

[edit]

The formula is currently , which is not the most convenient form. The most used form of this utility function is when only risk-aversion () is allowed and the formula is . The 1 is only for the convenience of having non-negative utility. If we want to allow non-risk-aversion behavior then we to allow for . To keep utility increasing in c that means we need to divide by a. But in order to maintain the reason for the 1 we need to define it as so that it stays positive (this is not the case with the current formula). We also need to define the formula for (risk-neutrality) which should be . I think we should note in the article the simple (only risk-aversion) formula and then the 2-case setup allowing any risk preference. --Bequw (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply