Talk:Exoteric
Add topic | This page was proposed for deletion by Carchasm (talk · contribs) on 7 September 2022. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Exoteric redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This soft redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
 | The content of Exotericism was merged into Exoteric on 3 March 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Untitled
[edit]I think we should add the meaning of the term exoteric in phrases like exoteric religeon , exoteric perspective , exoteric doctrine etc because all of them apear in various writings ,please see the external link that I added to this article and also and.Pasha 11:45, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
This article makes very little sense. 71.124.41.41 23:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, now it makes sense. But it's still basically OR. --Otheus 21:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
It is still contradictory , and fails to capture the meaning of these concepts. A rewrite would be in order. 2 may 2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.17.7 (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Addition and improvement of the article
[edit]Dear colleague from the English section of Wikipedia! Have you also noticed that the article doesn't make any sense, very little information and so vague, as if the topic is not covered? If «I» can't fix the article, who can? [A question everyone who reads these lines should ask themselves] (Thanks in advance for your participation). XMHNHMX (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)