Talk:Escadrille Spa.102

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Aviation / European / French / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Revert

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Synoman Barris Could you explain your revert. Also calling other people WP:VOAs without good cause is usually going to cause offence, especially in edit summaries where it can't be retracted; lets try to WP:AGF, now would you explain why you changed the categories back please. 74.73.230.173 (talk) 19:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am really sorry for this, I meant to revert another user’s edits. Please feel free to revert Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 19:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Synoman Barris It's fine, I appreciate the hard work that RCPers do, just remember to slow down a little and check the diff before reverting. 74.73.230.173 (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Revert