Talk:Environmental Integrity Project

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 September 2015 by reviewer SSTflyer (talk · contribs).

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article could go in depth more into what exactly the Environmental Integrity Project does for the four categories of issues that it works for (coal, Chesapeake bay/factory farms, oil/gas, environmental justice) as well as include information about some specific achievements that this group has accomplished.

The line about this organization's rating on Charity Navigator seems a little out of place, maybe that information along with other information about its merit as a charity should belong to a separate section about its merits as a charity. Glgaebl (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled