Talk:Enumerator (computer science)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

The formal definition is not in Sipser (2012)

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have Sipser (2012) (the only reference) in front of me. He only defines enumerators informally (as a special kind of Turing machines), and leaves the formal definition as an (uncorrected) exercise, so I've marked the "formal definition" section as unreferenced. Anyway, the subsection of Sipser (2012) related to enumerators is literally one page long (enumerators are only mentioned to show that many equivalent versions of Turing machines exist). Surely there is a better reference. Pripensanto (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Formal Definition issue

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

$S$ is not defined NoamB (talk) 02:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

The formal definition is not in Sipser (2012)

Formal Definition issue