Talk:Employment authorization document
Add topic | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
"How to"
[edit]This is written a bit much like a "how to".
What about some history: when this was introduced, for example? - Jmabel | Talk 00:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Employment Authorization Document → Employment authorization document –
Just why Enric Naval would "support" the downcasing of Certificate of Occupancy and Certificate of Need ("this is the generic name of a type of documents") but revert this to caps is beyond me. Here, "Foreign nationals with an EAD can lawfully work in the United States for any employer." It's just a work permit: nothing magical.
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 10:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Heh. Because for this one I checked websites instead of books. Many books downcase it . Support this move, I was mistaken in reverting Tony's move. --Enric Naval (talk) 10:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Enric. Dicklyon (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Logical, as it seems pretty generic from the outset. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.