Talk:Emagic
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emagic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]This is really strange. I added a link to a large Emagic user forum here a couple of days ago, and it got reverted, and was marked as a linkspam. Can somebody tell me why? Take a look at this forum: http://www.nabble.com/Emagic-f2878.html - it aggregates the user discussions on Emagic into a single searchable forum, you can post questions and find answers there, it's a highly relevant resource for the emagic users. why is this not good for this page? If this is a mistake, please add back the link to the page.
--Audiolo 22:18, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
It should also be mentioned that Emagic produced some hardware units of significant merit. Their MIDI interfaces were both comon and extremely stable, the Unitor-8 variants particularly popular.
81.111.125.222 (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Merrlyn, 23-02-2013
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.125.222 (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC)