Talk:Effective range

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Off topic section related to practical range

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The source cited specifically states the term "practical range" which is suitable for fire that is described as harassing and possessing only enough energy to take a combatant out. The paragraph should be removed or at the very least least, moved to its own section and defined that plunging fire, whilst even with weapon mounts/tripods and sights to range in machine gun fire for instance is not "effective" as a method of fire for taking out combatants or reliably able to kill. KarmaKangaroo (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Off topic section related to practical range