Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Edom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleEdom was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 1, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Edom today?

[edit]

The article provides no explanation for why many Rabbis claim that Edom today is in fact Europe. 86.162.24.149 (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jordan: periodisation much needed

[edit]

Missing, essential, nothing done for years. Please go to Talk:History of Jordan#Periods. Arminden (talk) 12:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article in desperate need of updating using more recent scholarly sources

[edit]

Edomites are Arabs or an Arabized people. This is not mentioned anywhere in the Wikipedia article, which relies heavily on biblical sources and narratives. I have added a few historical facts on the first extra biblical mention of Idumeans by Diodorus and the outcome of the Qedarite alliance with Egypt against Persian impacting the geographical scope of Idumea as a much smaller province. This source has a wealth of archaeological information that presents the ostraca already mentioned in this article in a more comprehensive light. It is in the bibliography now so if anyone is feeling industrious, please avail yourselves of it. Tiamut (talk) 20:44, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I recall that earlier versions of this article mentioned Arab origins. Noticing that this is no longer present, I reviewed the edit history and found that @User:Arp had altered the relevant text () without adding or modifying the cited sources. As the existing sources appear to support the previous wording, I have reverted the change.
The edit appears to violate WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH, as it introduces a change not supported by the cited references, and is therefore disruptive to the article's accuracy and verifiability.
If there are additional reliable sources or improvements to be made, please feel free to contribute. @Tiamut Theofunny (talk) 14:51, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for taking the time to review the history and restore the supported text @User:Theofunny. Much appreciated. Tiamut (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply