Talk:Eastern kingbird

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. I agree with you as well. However, there has been much discussion of this and if the currently enshrined exception is to change, doing it piecemeal is not the way to go and is a recipe for discord.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

---

Eastern Kingbird → Eastern kingbird –

• kingbird not a proper name Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
• I agree with you, but WP:BIRDS have an exception at WP:FNAME. Jenks24 (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Revert of addition to lead

This revert is peculiar. The intro SHALL contain some of the material that is in the following article. The article had a flag that the intro is too shoort. Ettrig (talk) 09:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

@Ettrig: Not sure what you mean by "peculiar". I missed the lead-too-short template when I undid your edit. Nevertheless, I saw that your addition to the lead was redundant of material already contained two paragraphs below, and that it introduced new detail not found below, and so found it inappropriate for the lead section, especially given the size of the article body. Eric ^talk 12:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)