Talk:Dutch Maid Bakery
Add topic| This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2026. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Dutch Maid Bakery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 August 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath talk 03:09, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- ... that one woman now does the work of six men at Tennessee's oldest family-owned bakery?
- Source: "Baking Bread the Old World Way". Southern Standard. Tracy City, Tennessee. 1982. & https://www.sewaneemessenger.com/headlines/?post_id=2277&title=dutch-maid-bakery%3A-120-year-old-living-legend
- ALT1: ... that a Tennessee bakery survived fire, war, and the Great Depression, but had to rebrand its fruitcake? Source: https://www.sewaneemessenger.com/headlines/?post_id=2277&title=dutch-maid-bakery%3A-120-year-old-living-legend & Hobbs, Margaret (2010). "Dutch Maid Bakery Celebrates 108 Years of Traditional Baking". Southern Standard. McMinnville, Tennessee.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Valhalla (Camp Ripley)
ke4roh (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2025 (UTC).
- Added links to article in hook. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 16:44, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Article is new enough (created 6 July, nominated 4 days later), long enough (at 2600 bytes), both hooks verified, under 200 characters and interesting. Article is within policy and QPQ done as required. JuniperChill (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I've reopened this one as I'm not convinced the first hook is accurate. According to the source, "as with the Baggenstosses, Dutch Maid remained a family run business with Day’s children, husband, and mother helping". So it wasn't "one woman" doing the job previously done by six men, it was a group of people, as before. Not clear if that arrangement is still in place either. With two stores in place I imagine the owner is relatively less hands on than before. Not mad keen on ALT1 either, as it didn't have to rebrand its fruit cake, that was just a marketing decision. There might be something in there if tweaked, I'll leave that up to workshoppers. Pinging Ke4roh Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- guess I should've looked closer and not only rely on Ctrl+F. I was in a little rush to review and will learn to read the whole source next time. not sure if i can still review if a new hook is provided, so that this can be counted as my QPQ (which good thing i haven't used yet). JuniperChill (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
@Ke4roh: Please address the above.--Launchballer 02:25, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for pinging me; busy as always! Thank you for your sharp eye, too. I'm certainly not intending to bend the documented facts beyond breaking! Here are some new ideas:
- ALT2: … that Dutch Maid Bakery, Tennessee’s oldest family-owned bakery, has survived fire, war, and the Great Depression?
- ALT3: … that Dutch Maid Bakery in Tracy City, Tennessee, has been family-run for more than 120 years?
Approving the following trimmed hook only (essentially minus the bits that don't check out):
- ALT1a: ... that Dutch Maid Bakery in Tennessee has survived fire, war, the Great Depression, and the rebranding of its fruitcake?--Launchballer 11:40, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
AI Slop
[edit]This article has been flagged as AI slop. Please call out your concerns here. If the concerns center around the sources that do not have web links, I have the corresponding photographs of the source information which I observed framed on the wall at the establishment IRL. -- ke4roh (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- The article was flagged as potentially containing AI-generated text, any other interpretation is your own. So I guess the best starting point here before anything else is: did you use AI in creating this article? Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- I did. I used it to:
- aggregate information from various sources I had collected by viewing the physical media
- identify other sources of relevant information
- generate wiki-formatted citations so I didn't tie my fingers in knots with that
- assemble a draft of the information I had gathered
- Without it I:
- verified that sources were real and said what the article said
- reviewed the writing and found it to be in keeping with standards I have been following for a long time
- copy-edited
- recognized that it was good enough to get started, and put it out there.
- So, I ask again, what are your specific concerns? -- ke4roh (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Ke4roh If he sees a dash in one article, this user will flash it. I corrected it. I don't see language that embellishes the subect.
- I reviewed the article the information is clearly not hallucinated information, nor copyright violations, nor claims not verified in cited sources, nor original research, or fictitious references. Filmman3000 (talk) 14:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I did. I used it to:

