Talk:Dunkel Index
Add topicLatest comment: 5 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 11 February 2026
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
 | On 11 February 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Dunkel System to Dunkel Index. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Contemporary Sources
[edit]Article should be improved by citations to contemporary reporting on the Dunkel System's picks:
- 1938 "final football ratings" lists TCU, not Tennessee
- 1959 "final ratings" were calculated and published prior to Syracuse's final game! Can't find an updated post-season, pre-bowl ranking. Although Mississippi was again No. 1 in the post-bowl ranking.
Requested move 11 February 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Dunkel System → Dunkel Index – Per WP:COMMONNAME and current branding. While historically referred to as a "system" in the 1930s, the founder Dick Dunkel preferred the term "index," and the organization currently operates under the name "The Dunkel Index." Modern reliable sources and the official website (dunkelindex.com) consistently use "Dunkel Index." Hinklehomie (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:25, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom. PK-WIKI (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.