Talk:Drosera anglica/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article is being reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 16:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • Made minor edits.

   b (MoS):

   • Minor edits to conform with MOS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Reference 6 broken. As the reference was cited only once - and then as a second reference to a fact, I have removed it rather than trying to find a replacement.

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • Reliable sources.

   c (OR):

   • No evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   • Adequate.

   b (focused)

   • Adequate.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   • No POV issues.

5. It is stable.

   • No edit wars etc.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 16:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)