Talk:Driffield Navigation

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Driffield Navigation is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Driffield Navigation map.

UKW Assessment

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Suitably referenced, with inline citations - ✗ Fail (Decline and Restoration need additional refs)
Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
Defined structure, with adequate lead
Reasonably well written for grammer and flow
Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
Appropriately understandable

Rated as "C". A few more refs needed for a "B". Bob1960evens (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Brigham bridge

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

quote : " Brigham swing bridge, last opened in the 1960s and then replaced by a fixed structure in the 1970s, was restored to full operation"

Not clear how a fixed bridge could be restored to full operation - which is what the text appears to say. Was the bridge unsafe/derelict/replaced again etc. ?

Can the text be clarified please. Thank you.83.100.174.82 (talk) 15:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Driffield Navigation/CommentsTalk:Driffield Navigation/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Inline references required using one of the {{Cite}} templates - Done Bob1960evens (talk) 15:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Requires infobox - Done Bob1960evens (talk) 15:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Investigate red-links to see if articles exist under different name
Replace HTML table code by wiki-markup - Done Bob1960evens (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Units need correcting as per WP:MOS - Done Bob1960evens (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Keith D 21:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 13:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

This page was redesigned at the edge.

UKW Assessment

Brigham bridge

Assessment comment