Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Domain separation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Dimawik in topic "More footnotes" tag

Definition

[edit]

The definition is very convoluted. The idea is simple, "Domain separation is an efficient means to construct different function instances from a single underlying function"[1] (italics is mine). My proposal is to use something similar and refer to this book as a source. Dimawik (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Hampiholi, Brinda; Alpár, Gergely; van den Broek, Fabian; Jacobs, Bart (2015). "Towards Practical Attribute-Based Signatures". Security, Privacy, and Applied Cryptography Engineering. Vol. 9354. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 317. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24126-5_18. ISBN 978-3-319-24125-8.

Title

[edit]

A message to the reviewer: my proposal is to put the article into the main spaces as Domain separation (cryptography) (over the redirect) to avoid future moves. See my comment at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25#Domain separation (cryptography) for details. Dimawik (talk) 01:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello! While I don't have much to add, I think you may be able to link keying material (which doesn't have a page yet) to "Key (cryptography)" by doing [[Key (cryptography)|keying material]], as it contains some information on that. Very interesting topic you've written about. Dalmationrotary (talk) 08:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Original research

[edit]

@ToadetteEdit: I do not see much OR in this draft as-is. The text can certainly be improved (for example, it is not written in encyclopedic style in some places), but currently the draft contains sourced statements interspersed with common-sense explanations that are not sourced - but can be without too much effort. It would be very helpful if you would add {{cn}} in the places that make you uneasy, so the cites can be added there. Thank you in advance! Dimawik (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Comments left by AfC reviewers

[edit]

"More footnotes" tag

[edit]

The article still has a leftover {{more footnotes}} tag. IMHO the problem is by now resolved (all nontrivial paragraphs have footnotes), so I propose to remove this tag. Dimawik (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply