Talk:Direct method (education)
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merits
[edit]The merits of the natural method need a serious overhaul. First of all, its written poorly, with a multitude of grammatical and orthographical errors. Just as problematic, however, is also the anglosentrical way it’s been written. CannedMan (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Additionally, the "merit/demerit" layout, while understandable, is rather stylistically different from the typical wikipedia article, and may warrant some restructuring for consistency if nothing else. --Argenteus.CG (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Weaknesses
[edit]What are this method weakness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.58.251.91 (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Direct method is a method of teaching language directly establishing a direct or immediate association between experience and expression, between the English word, phrase or idiom and its meaning through demonstration, dramatization without the use of the mother tongue[3]
Aims[edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.252.30 (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)