Talk:DirectCompute

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft

Microsoft Windows (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows

GPGPU is hardly a new concept; a much shorter introductory example (or none) with a reference to GPGPU would be appropriate. The current text makes it sound like Microsoft invented GPU processing. Actually, the entire article sounds like marketing copy. --Devnevyn (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Example code

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some example code, like in OpenCL, would be useful.
An example that could be written simply in idiomatic code for both languages might be even better.
Sm18 (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

NO IMPLEMENATATION

I ve seen no implementation of this technology in commercial software . Is it a viable alternative to CUDA or vaporware ?

16:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.5.134.180 (talk)

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Example code

NO IMPLEMENATATION