Talk:Dimethoxytrityl
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Bernanke's Crossbow in topic Wrong substance identified in chembox
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wrong substance identified in chembox
[edit]Should this be C21H19O2 with smiles of COC1=CC=C(C=C1)[C](C2=CC=CC=C2)C3=CC=C(C=C3)OC as the central carbon is a radical without hydrogen attached? Or is it a cation with smiles COC1=CC=C(C=C1)[C+](C2=CC=CC=C2)C3=CC=C(C=C3)OC Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- There IMHO should not be chembox at all, since functional group is not a real chemical individuum. —Mykhal (talk) 20:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- But it does exist as an separate substance according to the article. PubChem takes this to have hydrogen and calls it "4,4'-Benzylidenedianisole" Wikidata has a substance with hydrogen, but calls it a "cation". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Mykhal, I agree, the whole chembox should be taken down, and it should just be a figure like the wiki article on Boc or Fmoc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.228.101.246 (talk) 16:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- After just checking your edits, Mykhal, I see that you've been here plenty long enough – much longer than I have – to know all I say below. Sorry to patronize you here; I'm leaving it up for anon's sake. Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 08:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Mykhal & anon: There is long-standing consensus that {{Chembox}} should be used for ions as well as molecules, and the reasoning presumably applies to radicals as well. Written documentation of the practice is rather thin, but does exist.[1] The last comments proposing to do otherwise occurred at least a decade ago,[2] but there (I think) some merit to the idea: chemboxen are inappropriate for families of compounds, and the boundary between a common ion and its family of salts can prove rather thin.[3] The current choice enables consistency with our treatment of charged pharmaceuticals, whose articles are at the proprietary name of the active ion, not the formulation-variant neutral salt,[4] but still deserve a chembox. If you want to modify the consensus, you should probably reopen discussion over at WP:CHEM. Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 08:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- ↑ Christian75's comments et seq. in Template talk:Chembox/Archive 12 § Adding a short description and Graeme Bartlett's comment in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Archive 41 § Acetylide.
- ↑ Rifleman82's comments at Template talk:Chembox/Archive 7 § Chembox for NatOrganic and LabChemicals? and Talk:Tetrafluoroammonium.
- ↑ For example, see Talk:Phenolates.
- ↑ C.f. the discussion at Talk:Gadofosveset.