Talk:Digital automatic coupling
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Guidod in topic German overengineering
 | Another article is currently slated for merging into this article. Digital Automatic Coupling has been nominated for merging. In the discussion, editors reached a consensus to merge its contents into this article. You can assist with the merge by following the merging instructions. (July 2026) Do not remove this template after completing the merge. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Strength
[edit]The digital coupler can handle trains up to 700m in length. How many tonnes is this? How many axles is this? ----MountVic127 (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
In Australia trains using Alliance couplings can be 1800m long and so many tonnes in weight and climb 3% or 2.5% grades. Can DAC handle such gradients? ----MountVic127 (talk) 02:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice start. Needs more references that aren't the one manufacturer..
North8000 (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
German overengineering
[edit]Any reference for that? Guidod (talk) 10:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)