Talk:Digital art

Title clarifation

Could someone clarify what authors or communities use the term "digital art" in this manner. This is not a poor definition, but I imagine that there are other equally valid ways to define "digital art". Unless this is a generally accepted term, defined as currently defined in the article, we need to clarify whose ideas are represented here. -Ryguasu 07:15 Nov 17, 2002 (UTC)

links to organisations

I don't think there should be a link to Amoda within the main description, if they have paragraph, then there should be a description on every organisation. Their approach is not unique. Can I delete or at least change it, perhaps add others then to make it fairer and more rounded? keith watson

I've waited a while and no reply so I've deleted this apragraph, its not fai on all the other venues, we either have them all or none. Keith

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation–supported course assignment, between 10 February 2025 and 10 March 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Irvingneon0911 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Aidanohara12 (talk) 14:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Best way to include in Category "Lists of Software"

Hey, there's a "Lists of Software" category and it's a bit weird that there's no article in it for Digital Art software- I would argue one of the most important creative softwares out there. Obviously a list of Digital art software has been moved onto this page. Should this article be added to the category even though It's not a list but contains a list? Is there a more elegant way to have the category page link to just that header?

Thanks. Whyme943 (talk) 03:27, 29 December 2025 (UTC)