Talk:Digital Copyright

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

madmanbot

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

The madmanbot is making me a bit mad, since it seems to not be able to distinguish between a quote and a copyright violation. Set the trigger threshold a little higher, bot-operators! And also -- why cite it to google books when the same text is everywhere, e.g., amazon, bn.com, etc.? --Lquilter (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Just realized something else: Perhaps the bot is not recognizing items in blockquotes as being quotations? --Lquilter (talk) 15:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Okay, no action on the MadManBot notice for almost a month now. I removed the notice from the front page because it was huge and unsightly. But I'm not removing it from the relevant logs, so when some WP copyright person comes checking things out, they can still review the content. --Lquilter (talk) 18:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply