Talk:Delphi method
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Delphi method article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article is imported from Everything2; see their Dephi method page.
Some moved content
[edit]@Uclneaxel: Since I'm unsure how this highly detailed sentence which you contributed here fits into the broader context, I'm moving it here for possible comment:
The Delphi approach has been successfully employed to improve agreement between experts in iterative rating exercises on clinical test results using inter-rater kappa statistics as an outcome measure.[1]
References
- ↑ Petzold A, Biousse V, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Crum A, Digre K, et al. (16 July 2020). "Multirater Validation of Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures (PHOMS)". Neuro-Ophthalmology. 44 (6): 413–414. doi:10.1080/01658107.2020.1760891. PMC 7746256. PMID 33408429.
86.161.190.114 (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. I agree. Uclneaxel (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
[edit]The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is a notable absence under the variations subheading. It is commonly used in medical and clinical research settings with expert panels of specialist physicians.
https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/10/generating-evidence-using-the-delphi-method.html
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2011/MR1269.pdf Instantwatym (talk) 03:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)