Talk:Delicious in Dungeon

Reference troubles

Can anyone answer why I can see 3 & 4 under References in the article are showing up as the manga, but when I'm editing, I can't add the manga as a source; 3 & 4 are something else? Also, it would be great to find more articles on this manga that makes it significant as a wikipedia page, but all we have so far is a bunch of info just on the ranking... any ideas on where to find more? Maybe it just needs to get older so there's more published on it? CorrinD (talk) 22:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

@CorrinD: no idea what you mean on the first question - could you elaborate? As to the second one, the manga hasn't been published in English yet, so there isn't a ton of English-language sources covering it. But if you can read Japanese/trust Google Translate, Natalie.mu might have something about it (I don't know, haven't checked). G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Also, you don't need to cite the ANN reference for the character summaries (in fact, you probably shouldn't since it doesn't cover the information you've added). The only reason I did is because I haven't read the manga, so that's where I was taking my info from. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Add an influence/Cultural impact section?

As you know, the KPop Demon Hunters page has a section entitled "Cultural impact". I would like to do the same on this page, and possibly add the below to that section, which was formerly on the ND Stevenson page, rather than putting it in the reception section if at all possible:

In September 2025, Stevenson told hosts of the Crunchyroll podcast "The Anime Effect" that he became interested in Delicious in Dungeon, reading all 14 books within two days, because his spouse, Lee Knox Ostertag, interested him in the series. He said that they did a cosplay to ren fair, in 2024, together, as characters from the series, with him dressed "like a skinny Senshi...[with] seven beards."

Even if the above cannot be added (I'd argue the above could be used as an example of the fandom), perhaps something about the series influence/legacy/cultural impact can be added? The reception section of this page could be much stronger than it currently is.--Historyday01 (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

If you have reliable sources, I don't see any problems. The main thing is not to turn this into an altar like the one in the Uma Musume article, lmao. Solaire the knight (talk) 19:20, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, that's good. When you are talking about thee Uma Musume article, I'm guessing you mean this section, which does seem pretty bulky, long, and perhaps like an altar. Historyday01 (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2026 (UTC)