Talk:Defensio pro Populo Anglicano

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Removed "unsourced" tags

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have now updated this article and removed the "unreferenced" tag because now the references have been made explicit. I hope this answers the problems that Anthony cfc apparently saw with this article when it was tagged on 27 December 2006. Since I had originally written the article, I felt it was my responsibility to add what was felt to be lacking.

I was constrained to delete one sentence added by someone else, this one:

"In fact, in modelling his pamphlet on the Philippic form, Milton finds a classical antecedent for his method in Cicero's personal attacks on Mark Antony."

It may be right (and it sounds convincing to me), or it may not be, but I am not aware of what source the statement is based upon. Perhaps Wikeawade, who added this in the revision of 10:34 on 18 April 2006, or someone else can source it and re-add it to the article.--MollyTheCat 22:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Removed "unsourced" tags