Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:dd (Unix)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by IrisChronomia in topic A warning on disk-wipe examples?

Learn The DD Command External Reference

[edit]

This link is to copyrighted material. It is my material, copyrighted by me. I give permission to anyone using Wikipedia to use the linked information in any way he/she sees fit. However, if one uses the material, he/she must not charge money for any derivative writings. [user: AwesomeMachine]

improve text / examples

[edit]

I just /dev/zero'ed some harddisks and i found out, that the blocksize has a great performance impact

With defautl bs: 15MB/s

With bs=100M: 65MB/s

Maybe also mention that sending SIGUSR1 to gnu dd will make it print progress and writing speed.

Example code:

while sleep 1s; do killall dd -USR1 2> /dev/null; done &

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb bs=100M

X/Open Portability Guide

[edit]

WRT "In 1987, the dd command is specified in the X/Open Portability Guide issue 2 of 1987. This is inherited by IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 (POSIX), which is part of the Single UNIX Specification."

What does "this" refer to? the X/Open Portability Guide issue 2? Was that guide inherited into POSIX.1-2008? I find no evidence of that. Need a citation or to remove this claim.

Also, as this is history and the info is mostly chronological, it seems odd that a section about 1987 refers to something from 2008. Stevebroshar (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

A warning on disk-wipe examples?

[edit]

"To write zeros to a disk, use dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=16M."

I agree that a normal reader with some basic understanding of linux and/or computer hardware will see the "Disk wipe" section title and understand the destructive capabilities of the command. But, as Wikipedia is targeting a much wider audience than that, I think it might be appropriate for us to...

1) "Warn" it with texts describing the commands' destructive capabilities, ideally somewhere close. e.g. "as overwriting disk's content with [other] data results in complete data lost, it is common for dd to be used for..."

2) Warn it with explicit statements to the effect of "don't do this". I don't think this fits Wikipedia's MOS.

3) Not state the commands at all, and just state dd's competency / usage as a data wiping tool. If the reader really wanted to do it, the answer is just one Google search away; and whatever ends up top in the results would hopefully have ample warnings. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 15:55, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply