Talk:Davis gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

62mm?

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The citations show that Williams lists the caliber of the 6-pounder Davis gun as 57mm (which is expected since that's the caliber for nearly all other 6-pounder guns). So where is the alternate source claiming a 62mm caliber? Given that the 2-pounder is 40mm and the 12-pounder is 76.2mm (also the typical calibers for guns firing that shell weight), the 6-pounder being an oddball 62mm seems very unlikely, in addition to being unsourced and contradicted by the cited sources. — Red XIV ^(talk) 00:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

62mm?