Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:David Horowitz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by ~2026-84492-9 in topic Right and Far Right, and incorrect

Right and Far Right, and incorrect

[edit]

The following excerpt from the intro makes whoever wrote it look silly : “president of the right-wing David Horowitz Freedom Center (DHFC); editor of the Center's far-right website FrontPage Magazine”. For those who don’t see it, the Center is right wing but the website somehow is far right. First, it’s not “far” right, with that term taking on sinister connotations among those who use it. The website is pretty much garden variety conservative and the description should be excised entirely with the first adjectival use of “right-wing” serving for both Center and website. Unless someone objects, I will do so.

While not "incorrect" (in the sense of "not factual"), it is awkward, so I have deleted the description of the website in the lead, in favor of this sentence with myriad refs in this section #David Horowitz Freedom Center:
Horowitz is the editor of the Center's website FrontPage Magazine. It has been described by scholars and writers as right-wing,[5] far-right,[9] Islamophobic,[13] and anti-Islam.[16]
Does that work for you? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
It’s better, though I would say “critics” rather than writers and scholars, since it implies that the ones that do say this are dispositive. I’d also put the descriptions in quotation marks. It’s important that this be descriptive rather than tendentious and hostile, as decent encyclopedias are supposed to be. Sychonic (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Critics" of the site call it fascist. I agree with that sentiment but it is an opinion. The fact the frontpage magazine is a right wing, extremist site isn't really up for debate. ~2026-84492-9 (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Anti-black

[edit]

The statement "he has supported anti-black movements" sounds ridiculous. It should be removed, or, at the very least, supported by a citation. If a movement opposes, say, reparations, it is highly controversial whether this effort is "anti-black." 71.245.188.249 (talk) 06:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America.

[edit]

Was Horowitz Christian? The title of this book suggests the possibility. If it is known what his religious or nonreligious beliefs were, mention it in Personal life section.Rich (talk) 04:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your reasoning escapes me. Horowitz need not be Christian (or Jewish or Sikh) to pretend that he believes that there is such a conspiracy. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Penn state professor correct?

[edit]

"In another instance, Horowitz said a Pennsylvania State University biology professor..." Is this directed at Sam Richards, a professor of sociology at penn state?

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Richards_(sociologist) Under: Public reception States: "Richards was featured on David Horowitz's 2006 book, The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America, which criticized his alleged issuing of "out-of-class assignments," including the "viewing of left-wing propaganda films" Chumly409 (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply