Talk:David Hendricks
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Magnoliasouth in topic Worst article I've ever come across.
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Trial section
[edit]The "trial" section was full of a lot of comments that were not cited and pure speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.126.6 (talk) 04:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Where he is now
[edit]Does anyone know what became of Hendricks after his acquittal? Jeanie821 16:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanie821 (talk • contribs)
Worst article I've ever come across.
[edit]I can't believe what I just read. Could it be that David Hendricks himself wrote most of the ludicrous claims in the article? History.com is a reliable source and cites exactly why he was convicted; it's located here. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 23:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)