Talk:David Geier
Add topicLatest comment: 9 months ago by Hob Gadling in topic September 2009 (from draft)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
September 2009 (from draft)
[edit]David Geier won the 2003 Stanley W. Jackson Prize. That this prize doesn't have an article, (it is awarded for the best paper in the preceding three years in the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences published by Duke University) is embarrassing.
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/jalsci/jacksonprize.html
That a few people with an agenda can prevent David Geier from having a wikipedia article is far more appalling. That Stanley W. Jackson is missing is unbelievable. FX (talk) 00:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Google has no hits for "Stanley W. Jackson Prize" that do not also mention Geier. It seems not very notable. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)