Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
A fact from Dan Blumenthal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 November2023(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Dan Blumenthal, a senior defense official in the Bush administration, believes that China has "three roads" to gain control of Taiwan?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New and long enough, sourced, neutral and not plagiarized (Earwig's tool reports a possible violation, but that's due to the quotes used). The only problem is the hook, which is not interesting enough in my opinion. Supporting a politician's visit is not unusual; please find an alternate hook. — MaterialWorks20:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's better, but I think it's a bit too long; try to be more concise. Plus, it's not mentioned in the article (the piece is listed in the article, but there's no prose about it). — MaterialWorks09:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply