Talk:DNC autopsy

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"DNC's 2024 Autopsy Is Out—and It Completely Misses the Point". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Retrieved 2026-05-26.

Beginning page

Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This was just released. I am working on a draft real quick. I am not sure what the best title will end up being since it isn't exactly sanctioned by the DNC. Catboy69 (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

what is it referred to by, in news articles? use redirects with those names to this page

Democrats' 2024 election autopsy report
Democrats' 2024 autopsy

Xo4v (talk) 19:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Secondary sources

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do we need more secondary sources for the structure section? I was essentially just summarizing the table of contents. I am not aware of any secondary source that describes the general layout of the report. I understand the sourcing thing with the Argument section, although it is a little difficult to sift through so much coverage to find specific citations. There probably could be something added about the trans ads, since the media covered that part of the report a lot. Catboy69 (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply