Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Debbie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Undescribed in topic Indirect deaths

Peak intensity

[edit]

@Cyclonebiskit, Jason Rees, MarioProtIV, and Typhoon2013: Australian Bureau of Meteorology: ‘The cyclone crossed the coast with an intensisty estimated at 105 knots.’ Should we follow this or still maintain the intensity at 100 knots? -- Meow 09:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think we should go with what they said, after all, they are the official RSMC of the Aus region... --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 12:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Definitely go with the 105 kt peak intensity since it's explicitly stated. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 14:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Cyclonebiskit and MarioProtIV: As the bureau indicated the landfall intensity at 105 knots again, I have changed the values. -- Meow 14:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
The peak intensity is 105 knots unless the BoM, say different when they release their PTCR on Debbie.Jason Rees (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Severe Weather Events Report by BoM, reconfirm 105 knots again.--60.246.168.145 (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

2017 Eastern Australia floods redirect

[edit]

FYI, Ihave created a redirect from 2017 Eastern Australia floods to Cyclone Debbie#Impact. Not sure if this is how we usually handle this sort of thing as the floods are a result of the cyclone. Potentially expandable as floods continue perhaps? 220 of Borg 05:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Indirect deaths

[edit]

Are these those who drowned in cyclone caused floods? In any case 6 have drowned so the 5 direct/5 indirect seems figures seems wrong. 220 of Borg 10:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

@220 of Borg: Indirect deaths would be from car accidents, deaths from flooding would be direct. Not sure where the 5/5 total comes from to be honest. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 15:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Cyclonebiskit: An IP did this without clarification. Maybe Undescribed can help as they updated the deaths last here. Looks like 5 Qld, 6 NSW deaths, up to 16:10 on 7 April per SBS .
Possibly a hidden note <!-- As of 7 April: 5 deaths in NSW, 6 in QLD --> and/or footnote to clarify. Perhaps this will prevent AGF IP edits that may confuse the issue. 220 of Borg 02:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
As of 8 April, the death toll is 6 in QLD (with two people still missing), and 6 in NSW. However, I'm not sure how many of those deaths were direct/indirect. I've added the hidden note to clarify the matter. Hopefully at some point a report on Debbie will be released that will clarify how many deaths were direct/indirect, because I'm not sure how else we will be able to find out the details. --Undescribed (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply