Talk:Cryptophilus obliteratus
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 19 June 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cryptophilus seriatus to Cryptophilus obliteratus. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Qbugbot notice
[edit]This article was created by the bot Qbugbot. For more information, see User:Qbugbot/info. For questions and comments, leave a message at User:Qbugbot/talk.
Requested move 19 June 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation (uncontroversial change). If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Fortek67 (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Cryptophilus seriatus → Cryptophilus obliteratus – Cryptophilus seriatus is actually a synonym of Cryptophilus obliteratus, the newly-established type species of its genus. Occurrence is Holarctic (see e.g. GBIF</ref>, needs to be fixed in article. I am presently working on Cryptophilus, the background history and sources can be taken from there when I am finshed. Heteralocha (talk) 01:20, 19 June 2026 (UTC)