Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Croatia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Tomobe03 in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 17:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I am willing to review this article for GA status. In general, it seems to be a good shout, but I will be taking as close an eye as ever with such an important page. More to follow. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
1b [Skipping prose until I can do the whole lot.] "lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation":
  • Lead section: yes. Balanced and representative.
  • Layout: yes. Sections of a reasonable length, and in my view, with suitable weight to each other.
  • Words to watch: TBC
  • Fiction/list incorporation: not a signficant issue.
Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
2. Generally good. I have added a couple of {{citation needed}} tags where I think there should be a reference, or one duplicated to there. Some of the referencing styles are inconsistent, however, this isn't too much of a problem at GA. For example, some citations use brackets, some do not. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think there should be a sentence in "History" to the effect of "The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was renamed in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in ####" with a reference, it is quite unclear at the moment to which kingdom the section heading occurs. However neutrality is (thankfully) not a problem. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Added a few more {citation needed}s. A few comments on the images:
I'm also improving the captions myself, a few citations needed. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
The article is stable. For the record, it has semi-move and semi-edit protection. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
After a little further copyediting, I have passed the article. Please note the the guideline on non-breaking spaces:
Thank you for your review and copyediting. I have already corrected the things pointed out in the review. Finally, thank you for the very constructive comments.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply