Talk:Critical pedagogy
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critical pedagogy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 years |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education assignment: Rhetorical Traditions
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LisaParzefall (article contribs).
Malott's critique is inaccurately represented in this article
[edit]The last paragraph of this article beings "Scholars who have worked in the field of critical pedagogy have also critiqued the movement from various angles." However, the "angle" of Malott's critic is misrepresented, if not entirely missing. While the quoted text is not in error, these passages do not accurately portray Malott's statements. For example, section containing the quoted fragment "'long journey of self-reflection and de-indoctrination'" is titled "The union of Soviet Socialist Republics", and criticizes *not* critical pedagogy, per se, but very explicitly the "anti-Soviet position in critical pedagogy". Furthermore, Malott is explicitly non-committal with regard to the other quoted passage regarding the etymology of the term "critical pedagogy". The sentence begins "...we *might* observe that the term ... was created ...to dismiss socialism ..." (emphasis added). In the next sentence, Malott is, again, cautious about the pronouncement that "Critical pedagogy, as a discipine within educational theory, therefore *seemed* ... a conscious break from Marx" (emphasis added) and, yet again, "We *might* therefore argue that critical pedagogy has not become counterrevolutionary..." (emphasis added). Therefore, the critique is more accurately described as against a particular version of critical pedagogy as conceived within the study of education, and not, as the text of this article suggests, critical pedagogy, proper, as described by Friere.
In short, this article suggests that Malott "broke" with critical pedagogy, which not supported by the quotes in this article. These quoted passages criticize the view of *some* in the tradition of critical pedagogy who imbue it with "anit-Soviet" propaganda. I suggest this paragraph be rewritten to more accurately represent Malott's critique. Porcelain mouse (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: ENG 1320 College Writing II
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2026 and 13 May 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Uhj12 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by ProfRainey (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Continental philosophy articles
- Low-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- B-Class education articles
- Mid-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles
- B-Class Writing articles
- High-importance Writing articles
- WikiProject Writing articles
