Talk:Credential Guard

Independent sources

@Maslen: I'd rather reply to you here than by email–I don't really see how reference 5 could be considered independent, it's literally hosted on Microsoft's website. #4 meanwhile just doesn't seem like that reliable of a source (it's borderline, but it definitely doesn't meet notability guidelines on its own). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

My bad. I had the wrong title on the citation. I'll try to add some more sources and submit for re-review. Maslen (talk) 10:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@Rosguill: Could you please re-review? Maslen (talk) 14:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

@Maslen: Unfortunately I don't believe the current sourcing is much better:

is a Microsoft source

is a blog (see WP:BLOGS)

despite looking like a research paper (and written by what appears to be a well-cited researcher), does not appear to have been published in a peer-reviewed journal (although it does mention individuals who reviewed the paper). Nevertheless, it is currently the strongest source cited in the article.

is written by one "Cliff Hobbs, Microsoft MVP in Enterprise Mobility", and opens with a clearly promotional header "Why You Need Credential Guard"

is another Microsoft source

If you can't find additional sources, you may want to consider adding content about Credential Guard to a section in the Windows 10 article, since that's the OS it shipped with. You can even keep this article as a redirect, so that if more sources are available in the future, you can easily expand it. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)