Talk:Coventry experiment

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating an article on this study, which has had impacts with the field of 'consent' over several decades in the UK. Overall, I though that the tone was a little sensational, feeding into the hysteria over radioactivity; I have made some edits towards what I think is a more Neutral point of view. From my point of view, it seems to have been a small study (22 people) run by a local Coventry GP (J.U/ Shah) that seems to have been hyjacked to stoke modern political campaigns. Regardless, its certainly worth an article!

Klbrain (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI use

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Concerns have been raised about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. Rationale: ChatGPT params as well as other WP:AISIGNS in vocab distribution, etc Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Feedback from New Page Review process

Possible AI use